Right to repair: Question 1 MA 2020

Lazy8s

Well-known member
Staff member
Moderator
Are you folks seeing anything like this in other states? Ads/commercials about exactly what this is are so confusing :( There are a number of news outlets talking about how both sides are really confusing the issue about your data.

https://www.heraldnews.com/news/20200728/new-tv-ad-makes-link-between-mass-question-1-and-predators

https://g.co/kgs/BmxRwb

Ballot Text: Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives on or before May 5, 2020? This proposed law would require that motor vehicle owners and independent repair facilities be provided with expanded access to mechanical data related to vehicle maintenance and repair. Starting with model year 2022, the proposed law would require manufacturers of motor vehicles sold in Massachusetts to equip any such vehicles that use telematics systems –- systems that collect and wirelessly transmit mechanical data to a remote server –- with a standardized open access data platform. Owners of motor vehicles with telematics systems would get access to mechanical data through a mobile device application. With vehicle owner authorization, independent repair facilities (those not affiliated with a manufacturer) and independent dealerships would be able to retrieve mechanical data from, and send commands to, the vehicle for repair, maintenance, and diagnostic testing. Under the proposed law, manufacturers would not be allowed to require authorization before owners or repair facilities could access mechanical data stored in a motor vehicle’s onboard diagnostic system, except through an authorization process standardized across all makes and models and administered by an entity unaffiliated with the manufacturer. The proposed law would require the Attorney General to prepare a notice for prospective motor vehicle owners and lessees explaining telematics systems and the proposed law’s requirements concerning access to the vehicle’s mechanical data. Under the proposed law, dealers would have to provide prospective owners with, and prospective owners would have to acknowledge receipt of, the notice before buying or leasing a vehicle. Failure to comply with these notice requirements would subject motor vehicle dealers to sanctions by the applicable licensing authority. Motor vehicle owners and independent repair facilities could enforce this law through state consumer protection laws and recover civil penalties of the greater of treble damages or $10,000 per violation.
LESS
Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2020
 
Sounds like typical desperate fear tactics because they know they're on the unpopular side of the argument.

I haven't dug into the details of this ballot question fully yet, but i do know I'll likely be voting for whatever is the pro-consumer choice. This whole thing always just sounded like manufacturer greed to me.
 
Sounds like typical desperate fear tactics because they know they're on the unpopular side of the argument.

I haven't dug into the details of this ballot question fully yet, but i do know I'll likely be voting for whatever is the pro-consumer choice. This whole thing always just sounded like manufacturer greed to me.

Same here. Commercials are confusing as heck and the bill text looks confusing. I just want to make sure I don't vote for the wrong option.
 
Same here. Commercials are confusing as heck and the bill text looks confusing. I just want to make sure I don't vote for the wrong option.
Those ballot questions are often confusing and i think its intentional. However just a bit of reading up and you can usually figure them out.

Sadly i think a lot of people don't research though and end up voting for the option they don't actually agree with.
 
I think the bill wants to head off manufacturers either killing the OBD port or only sending the really good mechanical data over 5G to their servers which is why Telematics is even mentioned.
 
Back
Top