Well...at least it's got HBM2!
That said, in this close up picture at least a few more things can be discerned for the version being held by Raja, it's using 2 stacks of HBM 2.0 rather than the 4 seen in Fiji but gets the same bandwidth since HBM 2.0 also runs at twice the clock speed...
It's 500 Mhz base clock, Quad pumped, 4 stack HBM 1.0 for Fiji vs 1000 Mhz base clock, Quad pumped, 2 stack HBM 2.0 for Vega and the other big difference is that this configuration allows cards with 8 or 16 GB of ram onboard, so each stack could be 4 GB or 8 GB.
Fiji needed 4 stacks to even get a total of 4 GB of ram, so each HBM stack on Vega has increased it's density dramatically even if they're only 4GB stacks each for a potential " gamer " version, and goes to the maximum of the HBM 2.0 spec with 16 GB versions ( 8GB per stack ), assuming this latter one is exclusive to the Compute / workstation market willing to pay the price.
The last thing I noticed was the size of the GPU but this is just eyeballing it......Seems it isn't far from 1 inch per side ( so 25.4 mm) but slightly wider than it is taller ( slightly rectangular ), meaning a total size in the ~500mm^ range so it's a big boy and using the 14nm process that is smaller than TSMC's 16nm process ( a known fact ), it looks like Vega is larger than the GP 102 found in the Titan - X ( 471mm^ for this with a 12 billion transistor budget ).
The preview indicates a single precision math output performance that could be as high as 12.5 teraflop while the GP 102 in the titan - X maxes out at 11 teraflop.......
GP 104 found in the GTX1080 just isn't there at 9 teraflop, and a hardware castrated version of the GP102 in the titan -X, but used in the eventual release of a GTX1080 TI card, wouldn't be there either......It'll obviously have less single precision math than the Titan-X with less hardware onboard.