![]() |
Replaced my P2210h's with U2312HM's
![]() |
Sweet :drool:
|
That looks pretty sweet CMJ.
|
The bezels kill me.. :(
|
Quote:
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note II |
gaming maybe (if the game has lots of text or subtitles, it kills it. also games with inventory systems are a bitch). watching movies/youtube videos sucks.
for productivity though it can't be beat. |
Quote:
|
Looks fantastic IMHO. Subtitles and inventory screens I can see being a pain and give credit there, but seems like heaven for anything else. Especially first persons.
|
Looks especially bad for first persons imo. Be great for productivity though.
|
Quote:
When I have them in portrait, they constantly bother me. |
Portrait doesn't bother me, FPS/RTS/whatever. I don't sit right up on them. Distance is the key to triple display enjoyment for me. I don't watch movies on it. I also have a 24" ASUS
|
Never heard of a 120hz IPS display, what model is it?
|
It's not IPS, sorry, typo. fixed!
|
Quote:
|
Dat Bezels!
|
Don't like bezels? Here you go:
http://www.compsource.com/pn/PNK321/...-Hdmi-Speaker/ |
A quick and "cheap" shot of my computer.
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I haven't seen one in person yet (4k), I hope it blows me away :drool:
|
What is the minimum size screen that the benefits of 4k starts to become noticeable?
I would think it's pretty pointless on any size less than 65". |
I think like any resolution, the smaller the display the better/sharper the image would be.
|
I want a 32" 4K, I'm sure that won't be affordable any time soon though.
|
But isn't the purpose of 4k to have a sharper image on a larger screen?
With 1080p HDTV's, the bigger the size the pixels start to become noticeable at further distances. 4k fixes this problem. Large 4k screens will look sharper, but I'm not sure you'll see much of a difference from 1080p with a smaller 4k screen. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
27" at 1440p looks better than 27" at 1080p. I guess 2160p at 27" will look better than 1440p too. Personally I'm with baba, I think 32" at 2160p would be nice, but I would be happy with anything upto 40" or so I guess for a PC monitor. Curious as to what size a 2160p display would be with the same pixel pitch as a 27" 1440p display. I guess a mid way point would not only increase fidelity, but also give you a larger size, so would be the best. |
Quote:
If you're 15 feet back then you'll want 60" +, but if you're 5' you'll be happy with 32" IME. |
Quote:
If you take that height against a 2160/1440 ratio that gives you a new height of approximately 19.86". Using the Pythagorean theorem again with a 16/9 ratio, you end up with diagonal size of about 40.5" inches. Someone check my math....:bleh: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
That's a good point, upscaled vs. native res content.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. Copyright ©1998-2011 Rage3D.com