View Single Post
Old Dec 9, 2008, 09:52 AM   #105
SIrPauly
Did someone say, RGSSAA?
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: United States New England
Posts: 17,009
SIrPauly can beat 'Minesweeper' on any difficultySIrPauly can beat 'Minesweeper' on any difficultySIrPauly can beat 'Minesweeper' on any difficulty


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by caveman-jim View Post
Thats a pure rehash of existing info, and selfcontradictory - he states it will scale up as you add hardware, then says you designate one as a physX processor...exactly as you do now, no scaling on physX performance - it doesn't split over more than one card.

The way I did take that information is PhysX is scalable, meaning if an end-user has more PhysX hardware, the engine, if coded, may offer many more PhysX effect capabilities for the higher-end sku's than the lower-end Sku's.

So, if a gamer had Tri-Sli, one may have more PhysX effects than a single GPU. If one had a 240 core product used as a discrete PhysX GPU one may have more PhysX effects than a 128 core discrete PhysX GPU. Not taking this information as right now and in everything PhysX but eventually in some titles or engines moving forward.

It makes a lot of sense to be scalable considering the PhysX hardware may differ now and in the future. What about future nVidia hardware? Many more cores as well. Why should all PhysX owners have the same effects when some hardware may be much more powerful?
SIrPauly is offline   Reply With Quote