Go Back   Rage3D » Rage3D Discussion Area » Community and Site Discussions » Front Page News
Rage3D Subscribe FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Front Page News News and Rage3D articles as it appears on the frontpage.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Sep 18, 2009, 11:38 AM   #1
Advertisement (Guests Only)

Login or Register to remove this ad
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: United States Upper Midwest
Posts: 10,309
Android1 knows why the caged bird singsAndroid1 knows why the caged bird singsAndroid1 knows why the caged bird singsAndroid1 knows why the caged bird singsAndroid1 knows why the caged bird singsAndroid1 knows why the caged bird sings

ATI Technologies AMD Finally Gets Back to Physics on the GPU

I hope that these plans come to fruition.

Back in the days of the X19xx series Radeon GPUs, AMD and ATI were talking about using the GPU to process in game physics. This was in contrast to anything that was being thought about over at NVIDIA and, at the time, was even denounced by NVIDIA as a bad idea.

Unfortunately, AMD and ATI did not put much effort into moving physics onto the GPU and NVIDIA did. NVIDIA even went so far as to buy Agiea, so that they would own the complete PhysX library. This left AMD out in the cold as yet another AMD idea was openly taken and implemented by another company.

Well now, a few years later, AMD is getting back to physics on the GPU. They have partnered up with Pixelux and Bullet to bring an Open Physics library to not only the Radeon GPU, but to pretty much any GPU. This move should help to bring a more standardized physics library to developers.

Why is that important to you? Well, for starters it allows game developers to use a standard set of tools for in-game physics. As it stands right now, about 26% of developers use PhysX. This means they have to code triggers in the game to know when an NVIDIA GPU is present and when it is not. If an NVIDIA CUDA enabled GPU is not there, they have to offload the PhysX load to the CPU properly. This creates code overhead and reduces performance on non-PhysX enabled systems.

Now, this is great for NVIDIA as they feel it will compel (to say it nicely) to buy an NVIDIA GPU. But it is bad for developers and consumers. A completely open source physics library allows for anyone to use the GPU they want. Yes, it will still require triggers, but they should be less complex and the offload to CPU is usually much simpler to code.

I hope that AMD really does stay behind this and does not follow its usual pattern of dropping projects; sort of like a teenager gets bored of something and walks away from time to time.

Source: techPowerUp!
Android1 is online now   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finally back... m3talc0re Off Topic Lounge 8 Sep 15, 2005 01:52 PM
How do you think the half life 2 physics engine will compare to Far Cry's physics???? chadro PC Gaming 70 Apr 27, 2004 09:33 AM
Finally... I'm back Regime|Life Off Topic Lounge 4 Aug 19, 2003 10:04 AM
finally back with ATI... Hebertz AMD Radeon Discussion and Support 5 Jul 11, 2003 10:37 PM
FINALLY back up citywok Distributed Computing (Team Rage3D) 2 May 8, 2003 09:58 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. Copyright ©1998-2011 Rage3D.com
Links monetized by VigLink