A truly un-FRICKING-real video card review!

digitalwanderer

New member
Man, the charts give the victory to not only the 5600U...but they rank the GF4 ti4600 over a Radeon 9700 Pro!!!

You can view it in disbelief your very ownself here with many kudos, thanks, and big ups to Dazz for posting it at nVnews.

(Remember, NO GOING OVER AND FLAMING AT NVNEWS! :mad: We're better than that, so let's act that way please! :) Besides, they're all having a pretty bad time over there with this....how would you feel if the tables were turned and it was ATi pulling this? :hmm: Be nice, leave 'em in peace.)

EDITED BITS: Just wanted to add this so y'all could get a sense of what I'm talking about, although this reviewer does end up recomending the 9600 Pro over the 5600. :bleh:
In convenient and more visually appealing link form by request
 
Last edited:
About the edited bits.. could you please make that 500 character long URL into a link pls? All those numbers and stuff makes me want to go into a seizure.

About the review..

I can't believe such utter crap is being put out there. Unbelievable. They need to curl up and die for lying so badly...
 
I really can't stop staring at these numbers. Amazing.

Every single score in there is fabricated.

Or...

maybe there is something wrong with my 8500. They got great performance in Maya and 3035 3dmark03 marks. I only get 1400marks :rolleyes:

*throws away 3dlabs card and starts up maya*

I can only get 1200 with my ti4200 and they get 4354??

This just proves that a bunch of reviews are most likely fake. these people were obviously just too dumb and made it very obvious.
 
that's a review? LOL for who? The dumb and the ignorant?
hey motherboards.org you can show the bribes now. They're kind of obvious
 
i almost fell off my seat when i saw that....and my seat is a full size leather chair! :lol: I find it especially funny how he(presumably, i didnt check) wrote a paragraph about other reviewers and the problems in their techniques...:hmm:
 
OMMFG!

OMMFG!

Here's a couple of quick quotes from the author of that "review" from the thread over at nVnews. (Again, PLEASE no flaming/crazy posting over there...I don't want them closing this thread before I have a chance to grill this guy! :mad: )

ben6 said:
You all noticed how my conclusiion had cards and benchmarks which weren't posted don't you? Nowhere in the benchmarks are a Ti200 results listed.

Another oddity, my review had Splinter Cell as a benchmark (read the conclusion, now find where Splinter Cell was in the results.)

3rd point, I'm not happy with the way the benchmarks were posted, period and am trying to get them rerun

4th point, sadly I wish I had all of those videocards.

5th point, normally, I would ask volt or MikeC to post a link to my reviews. I've done neither on this review, and in fact have asked them NOT to post a link.

6th point, I've never seen a 3dmark 2003 score anywhere near 2,000 on a Ti4600 on any card with default runs which my results were.

7th point I wish I had a 3000+ XP .

Read between the lines.
And after a post saying, "how can ya read between lines, it's just space!" (or something else pithy like that, the original poster was much cleverer/sarcastic than I'm getting it across as)
ben6 said:
heh I'm not going to spell it out for you .Anyway, I wish I had 10 Geforce4s/9800s/9700s/9000/MXs .
Is it just me or is this cheeseball basically saying the whole review is a snowjob? :mad:
 
A "GF4" Mx 440 scores ~2000+ on 3DMark03, yet is only able to complete one or two of the tests...

Enough said on the credibility of this crap....
 
Jay20016 said:
A "GF4" Mx 440 scores ~2000+ on 3DMark03, yet is only able to complete one or two of the tests...

Enough said on the credibility of this crap....

:lol:.. My friend's Mx440 scores 212 marks on 3Dmark03.
 
In case you guys can't read between the lines, I have the folllowing computer equipment inhouse:

Ti4200 8x MSI (Did not use)
5600 BFG (I used)
Radeon 9800 (did not benchmark it for this review)
AIW 9700 Pro (I used)
MX460 reference card from NVIDIA (did not use)
Ti200 (I used)

2400+ XP (I used)
2200+ XP (DNU)
2.8 GHz P4 (DNU)

DDR400 256MB (Used)
DDR333 256MB (Used)

120GB WD HDD (DNU)
60GB WD HDD (Used)

Epox 8RDA+ (DNU)
Epox 8RDA3+ (DNU)
Soltek SL75-FRN-L (DNU)
Soltek SL75-MRN-L (Used)
Asus A7N8x Deluxe (Definitely Did not use)
Albatron i845PE (DNU)
SIS 648FX (DNU)

Also, I didn't go anywhere else to test for the review.
 
Back
Top