Intelligence Officials Say U.S. Has Retrieved Craft of Non-Human Origin

Shapeshifter

Well-known member
https://thedebrief.org/intelligence-officials-say-u-s-has-retrieved-non-human-craft/

A former intelligence official turned whistleblower has given Congress and the Intelligence Community Inspector General extensive classified information about deeply covert programs that he says possess retrieved intact and partially intact craft of non-human origin.
The information, he says, has been illegally withheld from Congress, and he filed a complaint alleging that he suffered illegalretaliation for his confidential disclosures, reported here for the first time.

Other intelligence officials, both active and retired, with knowledge of these programs through their work in various agencies, have independently provided similar, corroborating information, both on and off the record.

Thewhistleblower, David Charles Grusch, 36, a decorated former combat officer in Afghanistan, is a veteran of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). He served as the reconnaissance office’s representative to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force from 2019-2021. From late 2021 to July 2022, he was the NGA’s co-lead for UAP analysis and its representative to the task force.


The task force was established to investigate what were once called “unidentified flying objects,” or UFOs, and are now officially called “unidentified anomalous phenomena,” or UAP. The task force was led by the Department of the Navy under the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. It has since been reorganized and expanded into the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office to include investigations of objects operating underwater.

Grusch said the recoveries of partial fragments through and up to intact vehicles have been made for decades through the present day by the government, its allies, and defense contractors. Analysis has determined that the objects retrieved are “of exotic origin (non-human intelligence, whether extraterrestrial or unknown origin) based on the vehicle morphologies and material science testing and the possession of unique atomic arrangements and radiological signatures,” he said.

In filing his complaint, Grusch is represented by a lawyer who served as the original Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG).

“We are not talking about prosaic origins or identities,” Grusch said, referencing information he provided Congress and the current ICIG. “The material includes intact and partially intact vehicles.”

 
Wow... hopefully we get a flood of this kind of whistleblowers. Up to Congress to follow this up and make evidence available.

https://twitter.com/ralphblu/status/1665809626200264705


Ralph Blumenthal
@ralphblu
To be clear -- the Washington Post did not pass on our UAP story. Leslie and I took it to the Debrief because we were under growing pressure to publish it very quickly. The Post needed more time and we couldn't wait. #UAP #UFOs #flyingsaucers #ET #aliens #extraterrestrials
4:55 PM · Jun 5, 2023
·
139.4K
Views

Man...


 
Interview with the journalists who broke the story who happen to be some of the same who broke the initial Navy story in the NYT in 2017.

 
Bit of a timely event but some cops camera in Las Vegas caught a bolide falling down last month then a few minutes later a call came in about a UFO and aliens:


Not sure what to make of that other then the description of the aliens is a bit odd. If this is a hoax that kid is quick on his feet to exploit that pretty impressive meteor... It should be quickly investigated tho as that cellphone video can be examined for timestamps.

Kids version of the story:

 
Last edited:
There's no aliens. Or spacecraft. Or any "vehicle of nonhuman origin from outerspace". All you have is just further hearsay, a report, and an attempt at a conspiracy that would essentially cover hundreds, if not thousands of people, throughout the decades. Yet no one has anything tangible. No secret evidence locked up somewhere. Even terms like "possession of unique atomic arrangements" doesn't even make scientific sense.

Good to grab some headlines though.
 
I watched the Grusch interview. Strong smell of attention whore BS. I want it to be true but that guy is unstable.
 
I watched the Grusch interview. Strong smell of attention whore BS. I want it to be true but that guy is unstable.

I think its easily explained by the stress of having to navigate his obvious high level NDA's and the new and relatively untested whistleblower legislation. Its not an easy thing but its not about just him hes just one in a long line of high ranking people who have talked over the decades.

https://twitter.com/TheProjectUnity/status/1667173504653959173



Project Unity

@TheProjectUnity
Since Crash Retrieval Programs are trending, just a reminder that I challenged one of the highest ranking Intel officials on his involvement in the cover up, on the record, and his body language is telling, as is the fact that a NASA Mission Specialist recorded him in the 80s.

Video at the link​
 
I think its easily explained by the stress of having to navigate his obvious high level NDA's and the new and relatively untested whistleblower legislation. Its not an easy thing but its not about just him hes just one in a long line of high ranking people who have talked over the decades.

https://twitter.com/TheProjectUnity/status/1667173504653959173





Video at the link​

He's not even technically a whisteblower. His experiences are all second hand and heavily reliant, in his own words, "oral testimony" from people he claims he knew for years. In other words, "trust me bro". His entire premise is also based on certain government segments forbidden from requesting information, but this is actually common practice.

The fact that he tried taking his story to the New York Times and I think CNN as well, who rejected his story, only to be picked up by a small time news outlet "News Nation" indicates of his credibility and sources as well. I'm sure News Nation would love the attention they are going to get from this, hence it doesn't matter if what he says is true/untrue....just the coverage alone is a massive win for them.

I've also read he refused to go on the Joe Rogan show as well. Joe Rogan is a UFO nut himself but he's very practical and skeptical at the same time, so he would've asked questions Mr. Gruscher definitely wouldn't have been comfortable with. Hence the turndown.

I saw the interview as well (what they've showed so far), and I can't help but see "car salesman" in his demeanor. All his answers are circular and designed to bait interest in something, whatever that ulterior motive is.

Some people are asking why this isn't bigger news....well because it isn't. No real whistleblowing. No emergency meetings (lol). Just more and more "I heard this from this reliable source" and "I read that from this credible source" and "this person told me who I known for years" etc... ..
 
What consists of whistleblowing and can be covered by it and what isnt makes it hard to figure unless you have perfect legal knowledge of the NDA rules, which are likely extensive in the intelligence field, and the legislation. But we havent seen most of the interview so we are all learning as we go. The 2 reporters who dealt with him said it would have come out in the Washington Post but only later. I mean if hes really only such a glory hound why did he get called to testify to Congress? If its just a limited testimonial he would know it wouldnt get him far. Not going on Rogan kinda proves he isnt seeking fame imo. Normally a guy like this seeking fame goes to any large outlet ASAP to max the 5 min of it. If theres no followup to what he has to say, if all he has are unverifiable testimonials, he'll be forgotten in a couple months. It would have to be part of a process that leads to more revelations from him or someone else for what hes saying to have any value. Snowden risked heavy penalties and had to bail the country for what seems to be obviously defending the constitution. Its not surprising for a career intel guy to go about it safely.

Heres a good answer about the whole lack of evidence meme:

https://twitter.com/SicCoP1/status/1667313811953688578


Daniel Miller (SiCcOp)

@SicCoP1
The chief criticism I’ve been seeing not just on here but in most media pieces is a lack of actual evidence. No shit. Everyone agrees. I think lots of folks are missing the point.
@rosscoulthart
with a fantastic answer to that
@gangatoday1

Video at the link but basically he says he cant give out the evidence and is testifying so that those with proper clearance can get it out. Makes perfect sense to me.
 
Last edited:
Not sure if Larry is speculating here or is relating actual programs. I mean why would he know about this and the Defense Minister not know it as he states? Especially since he himself is not in the Government. Was elected in 2013 first time so not had any ministerial portfolio... he's just a backbencher mp. But Id like to see him interviewed and see what his sources are.
 
Honestly if Larry wont return CBC's calls then I think his letter can be categorized as speculation on his part. I get he's a fan of UAP's, many of us are, but if CBC came calling to me I wouldnt wait a minute to return their calls. He can still put out a statement anytime to clear up his letter and maybe offer us some sources. That Def Min Anand isnt responding is no surprise. They dont offer blanket denials anymore because if they do and anytime about a statement is found to be true they are made out to be liars. So unless pressed they simply dont answer anymore.
 
Canada's defense minister denies Larry's claims...

https://twitter.com/dsotis/status/1673401595050991617

Here's the full response I just received from a Canadian military spokesperson denying lawmaker Larry Maguire's allegations of involvement in a 5 Eyes #UAP recovery & analysis program.


Gruschs claims however are getting more confirmation:

https://twitter.com/StandForBetter/status/1673515200107151360


Senator Marco Rubio has received first-hand accounts from high-level government officials who have seen first-hand crashed UFOs in government possession. David Grusch is not the only whistleblower.
 
https://thehill.com/opinion/technol...ive-claims-of-illegal-ufo-retrieval-programs/
Congress doubles down on explosive claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs

Asked June 26 about allegations of secret UFO retrieval and reverse-engineering programs, Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) made several stunning statements.

In an exclusive interview, Rubio told NewsNation Washington correspondent Joe Khalil that multiple individuals with “very high clearances and high positions within our government” “have come forward to share” “first-hand” UFO-related claims “beyond the realm of what [the Senate Intelligence Committee] has ever dealt with.”

Rubio’s comments provide context for a bipartisan provision adopted unanimously by the Senate Intelligence Committee, which would immediately halt funding for any secret government or contractor efforts to retrieve and reverse-engineer craft of “non-earth” or “exotic” origin.

This extraordinary language added to the Senate version of the Intelligence authorization bill mirrors and adds significant credibility to a whistleblower’s recent, stunning allegations that a clandestine, decades-long effort to recover, analyze and exploit objects of “non-human” origin has been operating illegally without congressional oversight.

Additionally, the bill instructs individuals with knowledge of such activities to disclose all relevant information and grants legal immunity if the information is reported appropriately within a defined timeframe. Moreover, nearly 20 pages of the legislation appear to directly address recent events by enhancing a raft of legal protections for whistleblowers while also permitting such individuals to contact Congress directly.
 
Back
Top