Assassin's Creed Infinity will turn the series into a live-service game

xCLAVEx

New member
As if Assassin's Creed games weren't already a bottomless pit of stuff to do, Ubisoft now wants to literally make a never-ending entry in the series.

The aptly codenamed Assassin's Creed Infinity is set to be a live-service game that will evolve and expand over time, according to a new report from Bloomberg. Instead of it being one isolated look into a historical period, Infinity is instead looking to stitch different settings together with room to expand and develop each one post-launch. Bloomberg says Ubisoft has been inspired by the longevity of games like Fortnite and Grand Theft Auto 5, which continue to make Epic Games and Rockstar a stupid amount of money.

While Ubisoft Montreal and Ubisoft Quebec usually take it in turns to develop each iteration of Assassin's Creed, Infinity will be a joint effort between the two divisions with Quebec's Marc-Alexis Côté taking charge overall. Each studio will still have its own creative director—with Jonathan Dumont heading up the role for Ubisoft Quebec and Clint Hocking for Ubisoft Montreal. Bloomberg speculates that the two studios' occasionally bitter rivalry may see some future bumps in the road.

Following the report, Ubisoft posted a separate blog post confirming that the game is in development, along with providing a bit of additional context. The studio echoed Bloomberg's report that the game is still in the very early stages of development, and delved into the decision to combine the efforts of Quebec and Montreal.

"Rather than continuing to pass the baton from game to game, we profoundly believe this is an opportunity for one of Ubisoft's most beloved franchises to evolve in a more integrated and collaborative manner that's less centered on studios and more focused on talent and leadership, no matter where they are within Ubisoft."

Something which Ubisoft fails to acknowledge in its post is the fact that the reorganisation continues to leave many of the people accused of harassment last year in charge. "Several men accused of abuse remain in lead roles after this reorg, which led to complaints on the internal forums," reporter Jason Schreier tweeted. "A Ubisoft spokeswoman says they 'had their case rigorously reviewed by a third party and were either exonerated or underwent appropriate disciplinary actions.'"

Despite Ubisoft repeatedly insisting everything is okay now, nobody is really convinced. Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot said earlier this year that the company had created a "clearer, more comprehensive, and more actionable" code of conduct to aid in reporting harassment and abuse. But with employees still saying nothing has changed in the last year and Schreier's latest claims, Ubisoft aren't out of hot water yet.

https://www.pcgamer.com/assassins-c...rvice-game-with-multiple-historical-settings/

I don't like the idea of "games as a service" but then again, I don't play many Ubisoft games.
 
Yea.. they can keep their live-service game. Most of these live-service games sucks. Looking at Avengers etc.

Luckily there are plenty of other games/devs etc to keep us entertained.
 
Actually this might be pretty damn cool

Except for when you play a game that you personally like but financially it doesn't do well and then they shut the servers down...now you can't play it anymore. It's happened before.
 
If this series were still primarily assassination based I would have been interested. Sadly now that its evolved into a 'witcher 3 lite', they'll really have to impress to get attention from the people who preferred the stealth/planning mechanics of the original games.
 
I'd like to see another Roman period or maybe even Persian/Mesopotamia in their next title.
 
I had a hard time playing Valhalla. I did end up liking it but if this goes games as a service they will most likely lose me as a playa.
 
Live service is a dirty word to me. I don't really think it brings any positives. Probably cheap for them though.
 
Do companies think people like to play the same game forever? This is such a stupid idea, games have to finish and one needs to move on
 
I think this is a good idea, but I hope they change it up a bit. Odyssey was good, Valhalla felt really stale imo.. just kinda boring.. couldn't get into it much. I really would like to see a new combat system.

This could be great though. I'm open to the idea.
 
I don’t think last 3 games were gaming as a service. To me gaming as a service means that there will be events and crap to participate in and then pay for cosmetics or better loot (similar to Destiny or Avengers). It also means a lot of copy paste mission design (which is a UBI speciality) but still I already did not like Valhalla that much and this direction with multiple Assassins and not a coherent storyline will really put me off.
 
Back
Top