Intel 13th Gen CPU thread

https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/15949494

2133
Single-Core Score

23701
Multi-Core Score

Geekbench 5.4.5 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit)Invalid
Result Information
Upload Date July 11th 2022, 10:12am
Views 251
System Information
System Information
Operating System Microsoft Windows 10 (64-bit)
Model ASUS System Product Name
Motherboard ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z690 EXTREME

CPU Information
Name Intel Core i9-13900K
Click to expand...

Not bad my 5800x3d is 1621 SC. I wonder how good it would be at 5.5 ghz vs 4.55ghz but still.
 
LoL

Basically a 12900k with more cache and e-cores, clocked to the limit out of box, power consumption be damned.
 
Who the **** is skyjuice?

433watts is insane. I don't trust the source.

That's X299 14nm territory. 433watts would degrade the Intel 7 node - people have already degraded 12900K with 350watts trying to push record clocks.
 
Hes followed by some pretty good posters like 3dcenter, capframex, and retired engineer. This is a worst case scenario with even ecores maxed out so gaming/desktop use might not go close to that.
 
You can make anything consume that much wattage with stupid voltages set. Of course they don't say they're running 1.50v or something ridiculous, just give the wattage. Seems like typical garbage from leakers.
 
Salt

Core-i9-13900K-1507-2.jpg
 
I don't anticipate much IPC gain. I feel it's going to be driven by higher sustained clocks from the reduced voltage requirements. I'm curious how much harder the P-Cores will clock on Raptor Lake when you disable the E-Cores, though..
 
Nunz said:
I'm curious how much harder the P-Cores will clock on Raptor Lake when you disable the E-Cores, though..
Click to expand...

I knew you could do it but did not know the P cores would oc higher that way. You'll need to post an official Rage OC guide someday. ;)
 
Less heat from the E-Cores opens up some thermal headroom. It's not a large amount, but with 16 E-Cores on Raptor Lake, the heat load will be higher. My 12700K doesn't have much issue with it's paltry 4 E-Cores, but I have them disabled anyway. I ran the chip with them on at 4Ghz at the same voltage I use to run 5.1 All-Core, and I don't notice a difference, at least on Win11. I've heard there's some oddities with the Win10 scheduler and the E-Cores, but seems hit-or-miss.

I disable them just so I can bump the ring clock up. Lower memory latency > 4 E-Cores, at least for gaming.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top