{0}Salamander{0}
New member
Oh I meant more reviews etc, ive not seen any, just the founders edition 3070 cards.
Seems nobody here wanted 3070’s
I think Amd disrupted Nvidia's original planning and absolutely needs the 102 derivatives to compete and unusual, may even be reactionary towards the 6800 and 6900xt offerings from Amd.
If one desires value one should desire both Amd and Nvidia to do well.
For $200 dollars more, if you can find one, the Rtx 3080 offers around 30% more performance and an extra 2 gigs of faster ram, for nice 4k gaming, with less limitations. It's unusual for the x80 derivative to offer that kind of value when compared to the x70 derivative.
But also with the Radeon 6000 series also releasing in a couple weeks, I also find the 3070 to be a questionable buy. If the 6800 non-XT is closer to the 3080 for only $80 more, then that is probably the better buy for anyone who isn't running a G-sync only monitor, or otherwise deadset on Nvidia.
This I'm not entirely sure about, if you read the AIB reviews posted in the other thread, it shows the 3070 quite a bit ahead of the 2080 Ti in pretty much all benchmarks.
More so with DLSS2.0.
So now I'm questioning where the 6800 actually will land against the 3070. I cant wait for individual reviews.
Man this is a good time to be a consumer. It's been far too long.
I'm not entirely sure. I mean what was nvidias original plan?
Lets assume AMD doesn't compete this round again.
G104 then is the 3080? So in that case the 3080 competes with the 2080 Ti head for head.
G102 then is the 3080 Ti for $1200?
That doesn't sound like it'd pan out well for nvidia saying their 3080 barely beats the 2080.
I think with power that ampere takes, I think Ampere didn't get to what nvidia actually wanted as far as perf/watt. Opening the gate for AMD.
What also points to this is how unpreparred both nvidia, and AIBs were nvidia was likely still performing revisions fairly late trying to get as much out of ampere as they could because the design was just not as good as Turing was, considering how old Turing is.
I mean its all just speculation, but thats my theory. Something else I noticed I took apart my old Asus GTX 680 DCUII OC(for a shadow box display)and realized it was a G104 die.
The mythical and rumored Ga-103 die wasn't going to offer enough possibly for the original x80 derivative and offered the 102 bigger die for that $699 price point? It's unusual to launch with the big die at the $699 price point. Since when does Nvidia bring impressive value? Only when there is strong competition.
Again, I think it boils down more to Ampere not quite being what they expected it to be. I can't imagine nvidia ever planning to put the G104 or even a G103 on 3080 and expecting people to be happy with it trading blows with 2080 ti.
I think G102 was always going to be 3080, but likely at 999, with 3090 at 1499,
So annoyed at Bestbuy.
Had 3070 in cart, in checkout (Where it's safe)...
Not available for delivery/shipping in my area.
I'm sorry WHAT? I live in one of the larger cities in my state! So...couldn't order it.
So annoyed at Bestbuy.
Had 3070 in cart, in checkout (Where it's safe)...
Not available for delivery/shipping in my area.
I'm sorry WHAT? I live in one of the larger cities in my state! So...couldn't order it.