Report: AMD And NVIDIA Launching Next Generation Flagships In September

GSGRUNT said:
J two cents seems to think big Navi will be sooner(paper) than November.
11:32
[yt]B4uI4_KSYZw[/yt]
Click to expand...

we have no real info but here we go :lol:


it would have to be 350% faster than a 5700 xt to be 50% over a 2080 ti :nuts:


the 5700 xt is very close to a 2080 non ti and the 2080 ti is only about 30% faster than the 2080


https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/aorus_radeon_rx_5700_xt_8g_review,16.html


...........

Assuming that no other limitations come into play, a 100% increase in CU count and a 15+% increase in GPU clock speeds should allow AMD's RDNA 2 flagship to deliver a 130+% boost in performance over today's RX 5700 XT.
Click to expand...

https://www.overclock3d.net/news/gp...y_has_2x_as_many_cus_as_radeon_s_rx_5700_xt/1
 
Last edited:
acroig said:
RT effects are very cool, some game use them better than others. More RT performance, especially with Cyberpunk coming up, would be very nice indeed.
Click to expand...

I guess I'm hoping Navi 2X still has somewhat better RT performance than the 2000 series, even if it's slower than the 3000 series. But, I'm almost certainly going Nvidia anyway, as I have a g-sync monitor, and more importantly I don't think I can tolerate waiting until November to replace my 2080 Ti. If AMD were launching first I'd consider forgoing adaptive sync for one gen, but it doesn't seem like that's going to happen.
 
GSGRUNT said:
J two cents seems to think big Navi will be sooner(paper) than November.
11:32
[yt]B4uI4_KSYZw[/yt]
Click to expand...

I saw this yesterday on the couch and almost threw my hard seltzer at the TV.

It doesn't need 350% Jay. :rolleyes:

He's really slipping this year in his content. It's like seriously Dude, put some more effort into research before you turn on the camera.

I like the guy, but I don't go for him any sort of info, just to see him be goofy.
 
He makes some impressive builds, but much like Linustechtips, they are terrible sources of information.

The only guy I trust to give me unbiased stone cold facts is Steve from GN.
 
Nagorak said:
I guess I'm hoping Navi 2X still has somewhat better RT performance than the 2000 series, even if it's slower than the 3000 series. But, I'm almost certainly going Nvidia anyway, as I have a g-sync monitor, and more importantly I don't think I can tolerate waiting until November to replace my 2080 Ti. If AMD were launching first I'd consider forgoing adaptive sync for one gen, but it doesn't seem like that's going to happen.
Click to expand...

Same boat with G-Sync.... can't afford a new GPU and monitor at same time to go AMD.

I don't have Billy Bucks, know what I mean? ;)
 
acroig said:
Same boat with G-Sync.... can't afford a new GPU and monitor at same time to go AMD.

I don't have Billy Bucks, know what I mean? ;)
Click to expand...

:p

some of us were smart enough too wait and buy a screen that will do both G-Sync & Freesync :p

and don't care as much about Sync & Freesync now as I like OLED :drool:
 
acroig said:
Well shite man, 2 years is a long time to wait.
Click to expand...




but 4k OLED was worth the wait

........

but i had a 4k 40 inch non G-Sync or freesync

so I waited for everything G-Sync and freesync HDMI 2.1 and OLED and 55 inch


and i just refused to get locked in by NV
 
SIrPauly said:
Here is Amd discussing Inline RayTracing:

https://youtu.be/sW0g0lqsqKAs
Click to expand...
Patents Demo Ray-Tracing on AMD Navi 2x (RDNA 2) GPUs Using Dedicated Hardware
Click to expand...
If you don’t have the stomach for all the technical details, let me simplify it for you. In short, it seems that Navi 2x will indeed feature dedicated hardware for ray-tracing. These seem to be paired with each SIMD (two per Compute Unit), very similar to how NVIDIA includes one RTCore per SM.
Click to expand...

https://www.hardwaretimes.com/paten...navi-2x-rdna-2-gpus-using-dedicated-hardware/
 
bill dennison said:
navi 2x will have DXR and very likely some type of DLSS
so depends on how much faster than a 2080 ti it really is without any DLSS on both

15% = 749

25% = 849

35% = 899

45% to 50% or more 999


.........
now if it is the full 80 CU's and 50% more performance per watt ( like AMD says ) than a 225 watt TDP navi 5700 xt

and say a 350+ watt TDP card
it could be well over 2x faster maybe 2.5x faster than a 5700 xt

we could see up to 1199 air to 1299 water cooled
Click to expand...
I would like to see what prices midrange cards will go for in this new generation. I am only willing to spend 300 bucks for graphics these days.

In other words what will I get for 300 bucks?
 
NIGELG said:
I game at 1080p.

Maybe I don't belong on elitist threads.
Click to expand...

The question is will you be wanting RTX effects because even at 1080p a 2060 RTX will have problems maintaining 60 FPS on max.

That goes for about $320 today so I assume the 3060 will go for around that price?
 
I think we just have to wait and see. There may be a substantial increase in RTX performance this gen that makes the 3060 a viable card for ray tracing. There has been some buzz about there not being a performance penalty for ray tracing. But until the cards come out there's no much point speculating.
 
SIrPauly said:
Of course you belong here.
Click to expand...

When I upgrade the monitor to 4k then I'll have to think bigger in terms of graphics card/processor/motherboard costs.

I still find it difficult to buy any super pricy cards or hardware not because I can't afford it but because the time spent gaming is much less than it used to be. These days the time spent on gaming is between 30 minutes to 60 minutes per day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top